Skip to content

Forming Alliances: Initial Steps

Coalition Development: A Comprehensive Guide by The Ohio Center for Action, featuring a multi-part collection of fact sheets. These resources offer insights into coalition functioning, strategies for their formation and upkeep, and guidance on leveraging coalitions as catalysts for community...

Forming Alliances: Initial Steps
Forming Alliances: Initial Steps

Forming Alliances: Initial Steps

In Darby, PA, the DIANE Publishing Company published the Ohio Center for Action on Coalition Development's seminal work, "Building Coalitions: Coalition Formation and Maintenance," in 1992. This book marked the beginning of a movement towards collaborative efforts in community contexts.

A coalition, defined as a formal alliance of individuals or organizations, comes together to work for a common goal. In a community setting, this means bringing together diverse groups such as faith organizations, labor unions, environmental groups, and community organizations to collectively design, advocate for, and implement shared goals or policies that address community issues.

The purpose of forming a coalition is to pool resources, knowledge, and influence to tackle complex challenges that no single group could effectively address alone. The benefits of such collaborations are manifold.

Coalitions create a unified voice that is more powerful in influencing policy and community change than individual organizations acting alone. By involving various stakeholders, they foster richer dialogue and more innovative solutions. Partners can leverage each other’s strengths and networks for more efficient action and sustainability, and coalitions encourage participatory decision-making, increasing legitimacy and community buy-in. Aligning around a shared vision helps members develop a coherent future strategy grounded in community values and evidence.

However, coalitions also face risks and challenges. Balancing diverse agendas, priorities, and power dynamics can slow progress or cause conflicts within the coalition. The efforts to accommodate all members may result in less ambitious or less clear goals. Sustained engagement from members is crucial, but may be challenging due to varying capacities or interests over time. Potential exclusion or marginalization of some voices or groups can undermine inclusiveness goals. Resource constraints, such as time, facilitation, and funding, are also significant challenges.

Despite these challenges, the benefits of coalitions in community contexts far outweigh the risks. They serve as a powerful mechanism for joint action and shared visioning, yielding benefits of greater influence, inclusivity, and innovation. However, they require intentional effort to manage coordination complexities and ensure equitable participation to mitigate risks.

Resources for coalition building and evaluation are abundant. The University of Kansas provides toolkits on partnership building and community change, while Iowa State University's North Central Regional Center for Rural Development published "Vision to Action: Take Charge Too," a publication about community assessment, vision development, action planning, and evaluation. Coalitions Work offers resources for various coalition processes, and the National Business Coalition on Health published "Community Health Partnerships: Tools and Information for Development and Support" in 2011.

In conclusion, the collaborative approach to community change offers a potent solution to complex issues. By leveraging the collective strength, knowledge, and resources of diverse groups, coalitions can effect meaningful, sustainable change in communities. However, this requires intentional effort, careful planning, and a commitment to equitable participation to ensure success.

References:

  1. Ohio Center for Action on Coalition Development. (1992). Building Coalitions: Coalition Formation and Maintenance. DIANE Publishing.
  2. Butterfoss, F. D. (2007). Coalitions and Partnerships in Community Health. Springer Publishing Company.
  3. Herman, E. J., Keller, A., Davis, A., et al. (2011). A Model-Driven Approach to Qualitatively Assessing the Added Value of Community Coalitions. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 17(4), 310-317.
  4. Roussos, S. T., & Fawcett, S. B. (2000). A Review of Collaborative Partnerships as a Strategy for Improving Community Health. Journal of Community Health, 25(4), 289-302.
  5. Butterfoss, F. D., & Francisco, V. T. (2004). Evaluating Community Partnerships and Coalitions with Practitioners in Mind. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1-2), 13-26.
  6. Recognizing the power of collective action, rural development initiatives can benefit from collaboration through coalitions, bringing together various stakeholders such as schools, farmers' associations, and community organizations to collectively develop and implement innovative strategies for education-and-self-development.
  7. By fostering participatory decision-making and leveraging resources, coalitions can promote community development in rural areas, addressing challenges such as limited access to education, outdated infrastructure, and isolation, ultimately leading to more sustainable and inclusive communities.

Read also:

    Latest