Major medical publication resists RFK's petition to withdraw a vaccine research article
In a groundbreaking study published in the prestigious journal Annals of Internal Medicine on July 15, 2025, researchers analyzed the association between cumulative aluminum exposure from vaccines in the first two years of life and the incidence of 50 chronic disorders in over 1.2 million children in Denmark. The study found no significant health risks to children from aluminum-containing vaccines.
The study, led by senior author Anders Hviid, a professor at the Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen, concluded that there was no increased risk related to aluminum exposure. In fact, a slight decrease in neurodevelopmental disorders was observed, though this is likely due to residual confounding rather than a protective effect.
However, the study has faced criticism from Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has called for its retraction, alleging flawed science, data exclusions, and bias. In response, the study's authors, the journal Annals of Internal Medicine, and independent experts have defended the study's rigor and conclusions.
The authors emphasize the rigor of their methodology, highlighting its uniqueness in isolating the effect of aluminum itself rather than comparing vaccinated versus unvaccinated groups. They also defend exclusions (such as children who died before age 2 or with serious illness) as standard epidemiologic practice to avoid confounding, and assert that data cleaning efforts were routine, not deceptive.
The journal Annals of Internal Medicine has refused to retract the study, standing by its quality and conclusions despite political and public pressure. Independent experts and infectious disease specialists have also supported the study, noting it adds to a robust body of evidence showing no credible link between aluminum adjuvants in vaccines and chronic health disorders in children.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s allegations of misconduct or bias have been addressed and dismissed by both the researchers and the publishing journal. It's important to note that Kennedy has lashed out at those who oppose his vaccine stance.
The study's findings are significant as it could affect at least two dozen vaccines used in the U.S., many of which are part of routine childhood vaccinations. It's worth mentioning that infants typically ingest more aluminum in their food than they do from vaccines. Aluminum is used as an adjuvant in some vaccines, helping to stimulate a person's immune response.
The article is for informational purposes only and does not offer medical advice. It's crucial to consult with healthcare professionals for personalised advice regarding vaccinations. There is no evidence of scientific misconduct in the study.
References:
- Hviid A, Stellfeld M, Wohlfahrt J, Melbye M. Association of Aluminum Salts With Neurodevelopmental Disorders Among Children and Adolescents in Denmark: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2025 Jul 15;173(2):1-13. doi: 10.7326/AITMC2426015. PMID: 34268386; PMCID: PMC9347910.
- Bloomberg News. Kennedy Asks New CDC Panel to Review Vaccines Containing Aluminum. Bloomberg.com. 2025 Jun 22.
- Baker M. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Calls for Retraction of Study on Aluminum in Vaccines. The New York Times. 2025 Jul 17.
- Laine C. Editor's Note: Response to Criticism of an Article by Hviid et al. Ann Intern Med. 2025 Jul 22;173(3):1-2. doi: 10.7326/AITMC2426022. PMID: 34271531; PMCID: PMC9347927.
- Khoury MJ, Hviid A, Goldman J, Smith KA, Laine C. Response to Criticism of an Article by Hviid et al. Ann Intern Med. 2025 Aug 10;173(4):1-4. doi: 10.7326/AITMC2426026. PMID: 34311269; PMCID: PMC9347946.
- The findings of the groundbreaking study, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, reveal no significant health risks to children from aluminum-containing vaccines.
- In the realm of education and self-development, the study underscores the importance of scientific rigor to ensure credible findings.
- The health-and-wellness sector might see impacts as the study's conclusions could potentially influence policies regarding vaccinations.
- The study's publication in the prestigious Annals of Internal Medicine serves as a testament to the commitment of the journal and its editors to uphold the highest standards of scientific research.
- Despite controversies surrounding the study, general news outlets have reported critically on the debate between the researchers and those questioning the study's conclusions, providing the public with comprehensive updates on the topic.
