Parental Abandonment's Income Ignored in EWS Eligibility Determination, Says Kerala High Court Review
In the realm of Indian law, several significant decisions have been made recently, affecting various aspects of society. Here's a brief overview:
Anand vs. State of Haryana: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to an individual named Anand, allowing him to travel abroad for higher education. The court's decision came after a review of his case, which originally denied him permission due to certain conditions.
Aishwarya Rai Bachchan vs. Aishwaryaworld.com and others: The Delhi High Court granted an injunction to the renowned actress, restraining the defendants from misusing her persona without consent. The court also emphasised the unauthorised exploitation of a famous personality's attributes can violate their right to protect their persona from commercial exploitation, as well as their right to privacy and dignity.
Masoom Kaatil: The Delhi High Court upheld the Central Board of Film Certification's (CBFC) decision to refuse a certificate for the Hindi film 'Masoom Kaatil'. The court cited excessive violence, glorification of vigilantism, and derogatory remarks about religions and communities as the reasons for its decision.
Meghna Devi and Another vs. State of Kerala and Others: A meritorious student was denied an EWS certificate due to reasons including her mother's landholding exceeding the limit, the father's income not being considered, and a name discrepancy. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Kerala High Court's order and restoring the Trial Court's original decree for the full amount.
Georgekutty Chacko vs. M N Saji: The Supreme Court of India ruled that the absence of documentary proof for a cash payment does not negate a transaction when a promissory note confirms the debt.
EWS Reservation: The Kerala High Court ruled that the income of a parent who has abandoned the family should not be considered when determining eligibility for an EWS reservation.
Misuse of Internet: The court ordered Google LLC to take down infringing URLs and provide the basic subscriber information of the individuals behind the unauthorized activities.
Civil Appeal Case: The Supreme Court of India made a ruling in the Georgekutty Chacko vs. M N Saji case, but the context or case in which this statement was made was not specified.
It's worth noting that there are no search results indicating that Anand has been charged in court or specifying any charges against him. The court did not specify the context or case in which this statement was made.
These decisions highlight the ongoing efforts to uphold justice and protect the rights of individuals in India. Each case underscores the importance of adhering to legal guidelines and respecting the fundamental rights of all citizens.
Read also:
- California's Democratic Governor Newsom's drive for new House district maps is not set in stone, despite the heavily Democratic lean of the state.
- Comprehensive Cancer Care Strategy Encompassed by Siemens Healthineers Entirely
- Romanian ex-Prime Minister Victor Ponta ousted from PSD following independent presidential campaign launch
- Federal solar energy initiatives among Wyoming's tribal communities face varying outcomes following the Trump Administration's withdrawal of funding.
