Skip to content

Tech giant Google files an appeal at the Supreme Court against the NCLAT's (National Company Law Appellate Tribunal) ruling in the Play Store dominance case.

Investigation into Google's billing practices on the Play Store was initiated by the Competition Commission of India in November 2020

Google challenges Supreme Court over NCLAT decision in Play Store monopoly dispute
Google challenges Supreme Court over NCLAT decision in Play Store monopoly dispute

Tech giant Google files an appeal at the Supreme Court against the NCLAT's (National Company Law Appellate Tribunal) ruling in the Play Store dominance case.

In a significant move, Google has appealed to the Supreme Court of India against a ruling by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) from March 2025. The ruling partially upheld findings by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) that Google abused its dominant position in the Android ecosystem.

The case originated from a CCI investigation into Google's billing practices on the Play Store, launched in November 2020. The CCI initially found in October 2022 that Google imposed unfair conditions by mandating the use of its Google Play Billing System (GPBS) for app developers, while exempting its own apps like YouTube. Google was also found to have promoted its own payments app, Google Pay, leveraging its dominance in a manner that disadvantaged rival UPI-based apps, violating Indian competition law.

In March 2025, the NCLAT upheld several of CCI’s findings, including the abuse of dominance and discriminatory practices. However, it reduced the penalty from ₹936.44 crore to ₹216.69 crore, basing the revised fine solely on Play Store-specific revenues. The NCLAT also reinstated two of CCI’s key behavioral remedies: Google must disclose its data policies, and must not leverage billing data for competitive advantage.

Google is contesting both the findings of abuse of dominance and the continued enforcement of certain behavioral remedies. The appeal, filed on July 21, 2025, specifically challenges the changes approved by the NCLAT in May 2025, which required Google to adopt additional transparency and non-discrimination measures.

The Supreme Court is expected to hear the case in the near future, but a specific hearing date has not yet been publicly announced. The outcome could have significant implications for how digital platforms, particularly app stores and payment systems, are regulated in India.

Here's a summary of the case's progress so far:

| Stage | Authority | Key Action/Finding | Penalty Imposed | Current Status | |---------------|---------------|---------------------|---------------------|---------------------------| | Investigation | CCI | Antitrust order | ₹936.44 crore | Overturned by NCLAT | | Appeal | NCLAT | Partially upheld | ₹216.69 crore | Appealed to Supreme Court | | Further Appeal| Supreme Court | Pending hearing | — | Case filed, hearing awaited|

The case is closely watched in India and globally, as it could set precedents for antitrust enforcement against major tech platforms, particularly concerning app store policies, billing practices, and the promotion of proprietary services over competitors. The Supreme Court’s decision will determine whether Google must comply with the behavioral remedies and transparency requirements or if it can operate under fewer regulatory constraints in the Indian market.

In light of the ongoing legal battle, Google's appeal to the Supreme Court of India could shape the future of regulations concerning digital platforms, particularly app stores and payment systems, in the realm of general news and technology. The case, initially launched by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) in November 2020 regarding Google's billing practices and unfair conditions in the Android ecosystem, is also a significant topic of discussion in education-and-self-development and business circles. Google's challenge to the NCLAT's changes, which include additional transparency and non-discrimination measures, could influence the way major tech companies conduct business in India.

Read also:

    Latest